the ruck foundation

ruckfoundation

the independent guardian of Ruck’s promises — so they can’t be taken away.

a draft · published so it can be tested · being built now

why this exists

promises get broken when no one can stop it.

Apps make promises. Then ownership changes, or investors arrive, and the promises quietly go: features get paywalled, data gets sold, anonymity erodes. Usually there is no one whose job is to say no.

Ruck is built the other way around. Its core promises to the people who use it are written into the company’s constitution, and a single Golden Share can veto any attempt to break them. The Ruck Foundation is the independent body being formed to hold that share, on behalf of the community.

the constitution

eight rules the company is legally barred from breaking.

Not policies. Rules written into Ruck’s Articles of Association, binding on the company and its directors today. They can’t be quietly changed.

Read the constitution in full →

how it’s protected

a veto, and an independent body to hold it.

Not “we promise we won’t.” A structure that makes breaking the rules something the company legally cannot do without consent.

Ruck Social Ltd
builds and runs the app. It is bound by its constitution: rules written into its founding legal document that its directors must follow today.
The constitution
sets out what the company can never do: paywall the essentials, sell user data, target ads on sensitive characteristics, strip anonymity. Not policies. Entrenched law.
The Golden Share
is a single share with no economic value, created solely to veto any attempt to break the constitution. It can’t be sold. It can’t be pledged. It exists only to block.
The Ruck Foundation
is the independent non-profit being formed to hold the Golden Share. An outside body with no financial stake in Ruck, run by unpaid Stewards, whose only job is to exercise that veto on behalf of users.

where we are today

This is the plan, and it is being built now. The constitution and the Golden Share are in the filed Articles today. The independent body does not exist yet: the veto share is held by the founder in the meantime, bound by the same rules. We are publishing the plan in draft, before it is final, so it can be tested.

MilestoneStatus
Constitution written into the ArticlesAdopted
Amended Articles (anti-avoidance, audit right, Foundation naming)Drafting
Independent body formedNot yet
Veto share transferred to itPending
How the veto works in detail →

the pieces

read the whole thing.

scrutiny

tell us where we’re wrong.

This is a draft, published before it is finalized so it can be challenged. If you can find a hole in it — a loophole, a way it could be gamed, or a better way to do any of it — we want to hear it.

contact@ruck.social

documents